Commentary Quit Horsing Around, Senator, January 26, 2003.
Source: Los Angeles Times, Section: Opinion; Editorial Pages Desk:
Editorials Page: M-5
REBUTTAL
I don't think I've ever read as lengthy an Op Ed piece before
that was based 100% on erroneous information as Jonathan Turley's
Commentary on Horse Slaughter. Not one statement was factual.
First, to put Mr. Turley's mind at ease, no one, I'm sure not
Senator Feinstein, not even proponents, think this issue should
be included on our list of top national priorities. Such a list
would include legislation similar to Senator Feinstein's Border
Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2001, co-authored with Senator
Kennedy, to keep terrorists out of the U.S. or the Senator's legislation
on Port Security or Freezing the top income rate tax cut.
However, the American people also love horses both wild and domesticated
and want to protect these living symbols of our heritage and culture
against being cruelly slaughtered for the foreign markets. Any commerce
is not good commerce, and there should be cultural restraints on
international free-trade. And certainly our noble, beloved horses
should not find themselves the victims.
Turley's entire opinion is based on his assertion that horses are
also slaughtered for pet food therefore the bill is hypocritical.
That is incorrect. No horses are slaughtered for pet food in this
country, and no horse meat is contained in American distributed
dog or cat food. Horses are only slaughtered in foreign-owned slaughter
plants for export for human consumption.
His statement that the horse under Feinstein's Bill would "still
involve stunning horse's with a 4-inch retractable bolt driven into
the brain and hanging them by a hind leg before their throats are
slit" is embarrassingly misinformed.
This is based on Turley's second incorrect assertion that slaughter
and rendering are the same process. Slaughter and rendering are
two different processes. If meat is to be used for human consumption
the horse must be slaughtered in the cruel method described above,
while alive with the heart still beating. If the horse is humanely
put down by lethal injection and then rendered, the horse is dead
when the carcass is processed resulting in the same myriad of by-products
as a slaughter plant except the meat cannot be used for human consumption.
Skipping through and quickly rebutting the rest of Turley's folly:
Senator Feinstein's bill would PROHIBIT the export of American
horses to Mexico or Canada for slaughter.
It is APPROPRIATE for the issue to be in Congress because the
foreign-owned horse slaughter industry is inter-state involving
export.
The California win was significant and was THE LARGEST WIN OF
ANY ANIMAL INITIATIVE TO DATE.
Horse rescue at its best only comprises one percent of the American
horses slaughtered each year. Over three million American horses
have been slaughtered for the foreign markets in the last two decades.
And Turley's analogy about the cows and chickens? Cattle, sheep,
swine, poultry are categorized as legitimate food and fiber animals,
i.e., animals raised in this country and culture for the edible
consumption of humans. The horse is not. Horses are pleasure, recreational
and sporting animals. It is a very easy litmus test regarding any
culture's hierarchy of animals.
And Senator Feinstein is correct that the horse has played a significant
role in American history and culture. It was the horse that carried
man into war and back. It was the horse that pulled our wagons over
the Rocky Mountains and across the Western Plains. It was the horse
that pulled our plows to plant our fields. It was the horse that
delivered our mail. It was the horse that carried our goods from
the docks. It was the horse that pulled our original fire wagons.
It was the horse that carried Paul Revere on his famous midnight
ride changing the course of American history. It is the horse today
that takes our country to Olympic greatness. And during crisis,
it is the horse that partners with law enforcement to protect us.
The only statement that Turley made that is correct is that you
probably will see members of the legislature hashing out legislative
details at one of their favorite restuarants, Morton's, over a good
20-once steak. What you won't see is them eating a dog, cat or horse.
|